<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Technology Product Reviews, News &#187; apple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.certpiles.com/tag/apple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.certpiles.com</link>
	<description>Your Technology News &#38; Reviews Partner</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>CBS testing HTML5 iPad video out in the open, sorry Flash</title>
		<link>http://www.certpiles.com/cbs-testing-html5-ipad-video-out-in-the-open-sorry-flash/</link>
		<comments>http://www.certpiles.com/cbs-testing-html5-ipad-video-out-in-the-open-sorry-flash/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Ricker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[html5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hulu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macrumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[simulator]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/cbs-testing-html5-ipad-video-out-in-the-open/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center"><a href="http://www.cbs.com/daytime/the_young_and_the_restless/video/index.php?pid=uVlhXAdzgWqqCRu_Gj1qenTRaXvYwmdX"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/macrumors000617-html5500.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
Hey Dan, ever heard of a staging area to do your testing? Apparently not judging by the screenshot above. <i>MacRumors</i> took that "iPad - test - dan config - 3" content from the CBS.com homepage for a spin and discovered what appears to be <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/html5">HTML5</a> (<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/10/html5-vs-flash-comparison-finds-a-few-surprises-settles-few-de/">not Flash</a>) video. A bit more sleuthing reveals several "webkit" (the foundation of the iPad's and iPhone's mobile Safari browser) calls after peeling open the CSS. This suggests that CBS is preparing to serve up parallel HTML5 content with the launch of the notoriously <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/27/apples-ipad-keeping-adobe-flash-away-from-your-couch/">Flash-less iPad</a> -- take <em>that</em> Hulu -- becoming yet another high-profile company <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/20/youtube-hits-apple-tv-today-headed-for-the-iphone-as-well/">swayed into providing video</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/18/npr-and-wsj-building-flash-free-pages-for-ipad-apple-quietly/">other content</a> in an Apple friendly format. Then again, maybe CBS is just testing a "what if" scenario with no intention of moving this into production any time soon. US netizens can try it themselves by setting your browser to spoof the iPad's user agent and hitting the source below (for as long as it lasts) but you'll need the iPad SDK Simulator to view the actual HTML5 videos.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/cbs-testing-html5-ipad-video-out-in-the-open/">CBS testing HTML5 iPad video out in the open, sorry Flash</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 25 Mar 2010 05:09:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both;padding: 8px 0 0 0;height: 2px;font-size: 1px;border: 0;margin: 0;padding: 0"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/cbs-testing-html5-ipad-video-out-in-the-open/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160;<img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_VIA.gif"><span class="caption"><a href="http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=883175">MacRumors</a><!--//--></span> &#160;&#124;&#160; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif"><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.cbs.com/daytime/the_young_and_the_restless/video/index.php?pid=uVlhXAdzgWqqCRu_Gj1qenTRaXvYwmdX">CBS</a><!--//--></span> &#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19413749/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/cbs-testing-html5-ipad-video-out-in-the-open/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.cbs.com/daytime/the_young_and_the_restless/video/index.php?pid=uVlhXAdzgWqqCRu_Gj1qenTRaXvYwmdX"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/macrumors000617-html5500.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
Hey Dan, ever heard of a staging area to do your testing? Apparently not judging by the screenshot above. <i>MacRumors</i> took that "iPad - test - dan config - 3" content from the CBS.com homepage for a spin and discovered what appears to be <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/html5">HTML5</a> (<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/10/html5-vs-flash-comparison-finds-a-few-surprises-settles-few-de/">not Flash</a>) video. A bit more sleuthing reveals several "webkit" (the foundation of the iPad's and iPhone's mobile Safari browser) calls after peeling open the CSS. This suggests that CBS is preparing to serve up parallel HTML5 content with the launch of the notoriously <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/27/apples-ipad-keeping-adobe-flash-away-from-your-couch/">Flash-less iPad</a> -- take <em>that</em> Hulu -- becoming yet another high-profile company <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/20/youtube-hits-apple-tv-today-headed-for-the-iphone-as-well/">swayed into providing video</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/18/npr-and-wsj-building-flash-free-pages-for-ipad-apple-quietly/">other content</a> in an Apple friendly format. Then again, maybe CBS is just testing a "what if" scenario with no intention of moving this into production any time soon. US netizens can try it themselves by setting your browser to spoof the iPad's user agent and hitting the source below (for as long as it lasts) but you'll need the iPad SDK Simulator to view the actual HTML5 videos.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/cbs-testing-html5-ipad-video-out-in-the-open/">CBS testing HTML5 iPad video out in the open, sorry Flash</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 25 Mar 2010 05:09:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/cbs-testing-html5-ipad-video-out-in-the-open/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;<img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_VIA.gif" alt=""/><span class="caption"><a href="http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=883175">MacRumors</a><!--//--></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif" alt="source"/><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.cbs.com/daytime/the_young_and_the_restless/video/index.php?pid=uVlhXAdzgWqqCRu_Gj1qenTRaXvYwmdX">CBS</a><!--//--></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19413749/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/cbs-testing-html5-ipad-video-out-in-the-open/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.certpiles.com/cbs-testing-html5-ipad-video-out-in-the-open-sorry-flash/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WSJ on iPad for $17.99 a month, magazines to be at or near newsstand prices?</title>
		<link>http://www.certpiles.com/wsj-on-ipad-for-17-99-a-month-magazines-to-be-at-or-near-newsstand-prices/</link>
		<comments>http://www.certpiles.com/wsj-on-ipad-for-17-99-a-month-magazines-to-be-at-or-near-newsstand-prices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Ricker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[esquire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hearst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mens health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MensHealth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WallStreetJournal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/wsj-on-ipad-17-99-a-month-magazines-to-be-at-or-near-newsstand/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center"><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704266504575141822475202814.html?KEYWORDS=ipad%20conde%20nast"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/ipad-wsj-03-25-2010.jpg" /></a></div>
<span> digg_url = 'http://digg.com/apple/WSJ_on_iPad_17_99_mo_mags_to_near_newsstand_prices'; </span>
The <em>Wall Street Journal</em> is running a piece that focuses on ad sales for the iPad. Pretty boring stuff except for a few nuggets related to the actual content we crave. Rupert Murdoch <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/03/murdoch-confirms-wsj-coming-to-ipad-device-kept-under-padlock/">already confirmed</a> that his monument to main stream media was coming to the iPad. Hell, they've even been treated to a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/a-few-developers-receiving-ipads-early-must-keep-it-in-room-wit/">rare</a>, in-house device to assist with the development of the iPad version of the <em>Wall Street Journal</em>. Now it's quoting "a person familiar with the matter" (wink) who says that <em>The Journal</em> plans to charge subscribers $17.99 per month for iPad subscriptions -- for comparison, the print version of the <em>WSJ</em> costs $349 for 52 weeks or about $29 per month. Not bad, but you can't roll up an iPad to swat the dog. <br />
<br />
Conversely, magazines appear set to offer weekly or monthly editions out of the gate, not annual subscriptions. Sources told the <em>WSJ</em> that the April issue of Hearst's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Esquire"><em>Esquire</em></a> magazine (no stranger to new media) will arrive in downloadable format without advertisements for $2.99, $2 less than the newsstand price, and will include five music videos (each containing the phrase "somewhere in Mississippi," oddly enough) to take advantage of the device's multimedia capabilities. On the other hand, a full iPad issue of <em>Men's Health</em> with match the glossy's $4.99 price. Of course, as we heard earlier, publishers will be <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/01/conde-nast-stakes-out-leadership-position-on-ipad-first-custo/">experimenting with advertising and pricing models</a> to see what works so expect things to be fluid for quite some time after the April 3rd launch.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/wsj-on-ipad-17-99-a-month-magazines-to-be-at-or-near-newsstand/">WSJ on iPad for $17.99 a month, magazines to be at or near newsstand prices?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 25 Mar 2010 04:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both;padding: 8px 0 0 0;height: 2px;font-size: 1px;border: 0;margin: 0;padding: 0"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/wsj-on-ipad-17-99-a-month-magazines-to-be-at-or-near-newsstand/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160; &#160;&#124;&#160; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif"><span class="caption"><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704266504575141822475202814.html?KEYWORDS=ipad%20conde%20nast">Wall Street Journal</a><!--//--></span> &#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19413690/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/wsj-on-ipad-17-99-a-month-magazines-to-be-at-or-near-newsstand/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704266504575141822475202814.html?KEYWORDS=ipad%20conde%20nast"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/ipad-wsj-03-25-2010.jpg" /></a></div>
<span style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 16px; MARGIN-LEFT: 4px"><script> digg_url = 'http://digg.com/apple/WSJ_on_iPad_17_99_mo_mags_to_near_newsstand_prices'; </script><script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js"></script></span>
The <em>Wall Street Journal</em> is running a piece that focuses on ad sales for the iPad. Pretty boring stuff except for a few nuggets related to the actual content we crave. Rupert Murdoch <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/03/murdoch-confirms-wsj-coming-to-ipad-device-kept-under-padlock/">already confirmed</a> that his monument to main stream media was coming to the iPad. Hell, they've even been treated to a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/19/a-few-developers-receiving-ipads-early-must-keep-it-in-room-wit/">rare</a>, in-house device to assist with the development of the iPad version of the <em>Wall Street Journal</em>. Now it's quoting "a person familiar with the matter" (wink) who says that <em>The Journal</em> plans to charge subscribers $17.99 per month for iPad subscriptions -- for comparison, the print version of the <em>WSJ</em> costs $349 for 52 weeks or about $29 per month. Not bad, but you can't roll up an iPad to swat the dog. <br />
<br />
Conversely, magazines appear set to offer weekly or monthly editions out of the gate, not annual subscriptions. Sources told the <em>WSJ</em> that the April issue of Hearst's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Esquire"><em>Esquire</em></a> magazine (no stranger to new media) will arrive in downloadable format without advertisements for $2.99, $2 less than the newsstand price, and will include five music videos (each containing the phrase "somewhere in Mississippi," oddly enough) to take advantage of the device's multimedia capabilities. On the other hand, a full iPad issue of <em>Men's Health</em> with match the glossy's $4.99 price. Of course, as we heard earlier, publishers will be <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/01/conde-nast-stakes-out-leadership-position-on-ipad-first-custo/">experimenting with advertising and pricing models</a> to see what works so expect things to be fluid for quite some time after the April 3rd launch.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/wsj-on-ipad-17-99-a-month-magazines-to-be-at-or-near-newsstand/">WSJ on iPad for $17.99 a month, magazines to be at or near newsstand prices?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 25 Mar 2010 04:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/wsj-on-ipad-17-99-a-month-magazines-to-be-at-or-near-newsstand/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;|&nbsp; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif" alt="source"/><span class="caption"><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704266504575141822475202814.html?KEYWORDS=ipad%20conde%20nast">Wall Street Journal</a><!--//--></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19413690/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/wsj-on-ipad-17-99-a-month-magazines-to-be-at-or-near-newsstand/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.certpiles.com/wsj-on-ipad-for-17-99-a-month-magazines-to-be-at-or-near-newsstand-prices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPhone SMS database hacked in 20 seconds, news at 11</title>
		<link>http://www.certpiles.com/iphone-sms-database-hacked-in-20-seconds-news-at-11/</link>
		<comments>http://www.certpiles.com/iphone-sms-database-hacked-in-20-seconds-news-at-11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 07:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crackers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exploit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exploited]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hackers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malicious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pwn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pwn 2 own]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pwn2own]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pwnage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pwned]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ralf-Philipp Weinmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ralf-philippWeinmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security hole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security holes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SecurityHole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SecurityHoles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[text messaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TextMessaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[txt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[txt messages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TxtMessages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vincenzo Iozzo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VincenzoIozzo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/iphone-sms-database-hacked-in-20-seconds-news-at-11/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center"><a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=5836"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/3-24-10-iphonepwned20sec.png" /><br />
</a></div>
It's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/12/researchers-warn-of-hacking-risks-to-heart-devices/">a story tailor-made</a> for the fear-mongering subset of news media. This week, a pair of gentlemen lured an unsuspecting virgin iPhone to a malicious website and -- with no other input from the user -- stole the phone's entire database of sent, received and even <em>deleted</em> text messages in under 20 seconds, boasting that they could easily lift personal contacts, emails and your naughty, naughty photos as well. Thankfully for us level-headed souls, those gentlemen were Vincenzo Iozzo and Ralf-Philipp Weinmann, security researchers performing for the 2010 <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/pwn2own">Pwn2Own</a> hacking contest, and their $15,000 first prize ensures that the winning formula will go to Apple (and only Apple) for further study. Last year, smartphones <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/25/major-smartphone-platforms-emerge-unscathed-from-pwn2own/">emerged from Pwn2Own unscathed</a> even as their <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/19/the-pwn2own-trifecta-safari-ie-8-and-firefox-exploited-on-day/">desktop counterparts took a beating</a>, but this makes the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/22/safari-browser-exploit-produced-within-9-hours-in-hacking-compet/">third year</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/pwn-2-own-over-macbook-air-gets-seized-in-2-minutes-flat/">in a row</a> that Safari's gotten its host machines <em>pwned</em>. That said, there's no need for fear -- just a healthy reminder that the Apple logo doesn't give you free license to click links in those oh-so-tempting "beta-test the new iPad!" emails.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/iphone-sms-database-hacked-in-20-seconds-news-at-11/">iPhone SMS database hacked in 20 seconds, news at 11</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 25 Mar 2010 02:36:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both;padding: 8px 0 0 0;height: 2px;font-size: 1px;border: 0;margin: 0;padding: 0"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/iphone-sms-database-hacked-in-20-seconds-news-at-11/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160;<img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_VIA.gif"><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2010/03/24/iphone-and-sms-database-hacked-at-pwn2own-contest/">TUAW</a><!--//--></span> &#160;&#124;&#160; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif"><span class="caption"><a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=5836">ZDNet</a><!--//--></span> &#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19413532/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/iphone-sms-database-hacked-in-20-seconds-news-at-11/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=5836"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/3-24-10-iphonepwned20sec.png" /><br />
</a></div>
It's <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/12/researchers-warn-of-hacking-risks-to-heart-devices/">a story tailor-made</a> for the fear-mongering subset of news media. This week, a pair of gentlemen lured an unsuspecting virgin iPhone to a malicious website and -- with no other input from the user -- stole the phone's entire database of sent, received and even <em>deleted</em> text messages in under 20 seconds, boasting that they could easily lift personal contacts, emails and your naughty, naughty photos as well. Thankfully for us level-headed souls, those gentlemen were Vincenzo Iozzo and Ralf-Philipp Weinmann, security researchers performing for the 2010 <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/pwn2own">Pwn2Own</a> hacking contest, and their $15,000 first prize ensures that the winning formula will go to Apple (and only Apple) for further study. Last year, smartphones <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/25/major-smartphone-platforms-emerge-unscathed-from-pwn2own/">emerged from Pwn2Own unscathed</a> even as their <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/19/the-pwn2own-trifecta-safari-ie-8-and-firefox-exploited-on-day/">desktop counterparts took a beating</a>, but this makes the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/22/safari-browser-exploit-produced-within-9-hours-in-hacking-compet/">third year</a> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/27/pwn-2-own-over-macbook-air-gets-seized-in-2-minutes-flat/">in a row</a> that Safari's gotten its host machines <em>pwned</em>. That said, there's no need for fear -- just a healthy reminder that the Apple logo doesn't give you free license to click links in those oh-so-tempting "beta-test the new iPad!" emails.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/iphone-sms-database-hacked-in-20-seconds-news-at-11/">iPhone SMS database hacked in 20 seconds, news at 11</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 25 Mar 2010 02:36:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/iphone-sms-database-hacked-in-20-seconds-news-at-11/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;<img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_VIA.gif" alt=""/><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2010/03/24/iphone-and-sms-database-hacked-at-pwn2own-contest/">TUAW</a><!--//--></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif" alt="source"/><span class="caption"><a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=5836">ZDNet</a><!--//--></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19413532/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/25/iphone-sms-database-hacked-in-20-seconds-news-at-11/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.certpiles.com/iphone-sms-database-hacked-in-20-seconds-news-at-11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Survey finds people eager to &#8216;work on the go&#8217; with iPad, we wonder what line of &#8216;work&#8217; they&#8217;re in</title>
		<link>http://www.certpiles.com/survey-finds-people-eager-to-work-on-the-go-with-ipad-we-wonder-what-line-of-work-theyre-in/</link>
		<comments>http://www.certpiles.com/survey-finds-people-eager-to-work-on-the-go-with-ipad-we-wonder-what-line-of-work-theyre-in/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 22:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple tablet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AppleIpad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AppleTablet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CTIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ctia 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ctia2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone os]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IphoneOs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multitasking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sybase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablet pc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TabletPc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[working]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/24/survey-finds-people-eager-to-work-on-the-go-with-ipad-we-wond/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center"><a href="http://www.sybase.com/detail?id=1069007&#38;contentOnly=true"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/ipad-work-machine.jpg" /></a></div>
So, give this a listen -- a survey from the lairs of Sybase has found that among smartphone-owning respondents, some 52.3 percent of them "would use a tablet device such as the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/product/apple-ipad">Apple iPad</a> is for working on the go." We fully understand that this phrase leaves open the possibility of using tablets <i>not</i> Designed in Cupertino, but the mere fact that it's highlighted gave us pause. We're <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/27/editorial-engadget-on-the-ipad/">still trying to figure out</a> how exactly Apple's forthcoming tablet is going to fit between our daily laptop and workhorse-of-a-smartphone, and without a major overhaul of the iPhone OS, we definitely can't visualize ourselves using it for "work." 'Course, maybe they're into something that doesn't require the use of multiple applications at once, and maybe the dearth of a real keyboard isn't much of a productivity killer, but we're just not sold on the iPad being a bona fide work machine as-is. So, what say you? Are you one of those 52.3 percenters? Or do you relate more with the vocal minority?<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/24/survey-finds-people-eager-to-work-on-the-go-with-ipad-we-wond/">Survey finds people eager to 'work on the go' with iPad, we wonder what line of 'work' they're in</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:21:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both;padding: 8px 0 0 0;height: 2px;font-size: 1px;border: 0;margin: 0;padding: 0"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/24/survey-finds-people-eager-to-work-on-the-go-with-ipad-we-wond/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160;<img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_VIA.gif"><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/10/03/24/no_1_planned_use_for_apple_ipad_working_on_the_go.html">Apple Insider</a><!--//--></span> &#160;&#124;&#160; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif"><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.sybase.com/detail?id=1069007&#38;contentOnly=true">Sybase</a><!--//--></span> &#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19412690/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/24/survey-finds-people-eager-to-work-on-the-go-with-ipad-we-wond/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.sybase.com/detail?id=1069007&amp;contentOnly=true"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/ipad-work-machine.jpg" /></a></div>
So, give this a listen -- a survey from the lairs of Sybase has found that among smartphone-owning respondents, some 52.3 percent of them "would use a tablet device such as the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/product/apple-ipad">Apple iPad</a> is for working on the go." We fully understand that this phrase leaves open the possibility of using tablets <i>not</i> Designed in Cupertino, but the mere fact that it's highlighted gave us pause. We're <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/27/editorial-engadget-on-the-ipad/">still trying to figure out</a> how exactly Apple's forthcoming tablet is going to fit between our daily laptop and workhorse-of-a-smartphone, and without a major overhaul of the iPhone OS, we definitely can't visualize ourselves using it for "work." 'Course, maybe they're into something that doesn't require the use of multiple applications at once, and maybe the dearth of a real keyboard isn't much of a productivity killer, but we're just not sold on the iPad being a bona fide work machine as-is. So, what say you? Are you one of those 52.3 percenters? Or do you relate more with the vocal minority?<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/24/survey-finds-people-eager-to-work-on-the-go-with-ipad-we-wond/">Survey finds people eager to 'work on the go' with iPad, we wonder what line of 'work' they're in</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:21:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/24/survey-finds-people-eager-to-work-on-the-go-with-ipad-we-wond/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;<img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_VIA.gif" alt=""/><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/10/03/24/no_1_planned_use_for_apple_ipad_working_on_the_go.html">Apple Insider</a><!--//--></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif" alt="source"/><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.sybase.com/detail?id=1069007&amp;contentOnly=true">Sybase</a><!--//--></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19412690/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/24/survey-finds-people-eager-to-work-on-the-go-with-ipad-we-wond/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.certpiles.com/survey-finds-people-eager-to-work-on-the-go-with-ipad-we-wonder-what-line-of-work-theyre-in/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MOTO touchscreen comparison recruits robotic implements for heightened precision (video)</title>
		<link>http://www.certpiles.com/moto-touchscreen-comparison-recruits-robotic-implements-for-heightened-precision-video/</link>
		<comments>http://www.certpiles.com/moto-touchscreen-comparison-recruits-robotic-implements-for-heightened-precision-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vladislav Savov</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capacitive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compared]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[droid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[droid eris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DroidEris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[htc droid eris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HtcDroidEris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moto development group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moto development labs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moto labs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MotoDevelopmentGroup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MotoDevelopmentLabs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MotoLabs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motorola droid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MotorolaDroid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nexus one]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NexusOne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone comparison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PhoneComparison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[touchscreen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[touchscreen comparison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TouchscreenComparison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[touchscreens]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/24/moto-touchscreen-comparison-recruits-robotic-implements-for-heig/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center"><a href="http://labs.moto.com/robot_touchscreen_analysis/"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/24mar10ob6525cwee-1269426601.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
<span> digg_url = 'http://digg.com/gadgets/MOTO_touchscreen_comparison_recruits_robotic_implements_for'; </span>So you saw that the first <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/moto-gives-straight-advice-on-smartphone-touchscreen-quality/">MOTO smartphone touchscreen comparison</a> was done with a fleshy humanoid controlling the testing finger and discounted it as scientifically flawed? Well, MOTO's back and this time the arm of judgment is operated by a coldly mechanical and ruthlessly precise robot -- a machine in itself, we'll assume the robot is intrinsically immune to developing fanboy tendencies. Joining the iPhone, Droid Eris, Droid, and Nexus One of the earlier test are Palm's Pre and RIM's BlackBerry Storm 2, whose results you can see at the source link below. The full test methodology is also explained there, including a list of the drawing apps used, which were selected with a view to minimizing smoothing algorithms that may prejudice the outcome. We're not gonna tell you who won, you have eyes of your own after all, and will just direct you after the break for the full robot-on-smartphone video action.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/24/moto-touchscreen-comparison-recruits-robotic-implements-for-heig/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>MOTO touchscreen comparison recruits robotic implements for heightened precision (video)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/24/moto-touchscreen-comparison-recruits-robotic-implements-for-heig/">MOTO touchscreen comparison recruits robotic implements for heightened precision (video)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 24 Mar 2010 07:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both;padding: 8px 0 0 0;height: 2px;font-size: 1px;border: 0;margin: 0;padding: 0"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/24/moto-touchscreen-comparison-recruits-robotic-implements-for-heig/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160; &#160;&#124;&#160; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif"><span class="caption"><a href="http://labs.moto.com/robot_touchscreen_analysis/">MOTO</a><!--//--></span> &#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19412173/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/24/moto-touchscreen-comparison-recruits-robotic-implements-for-heig/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://labs.moto.com/robot_touchscreen_analysis/"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/24mar10ob6525cwee-1269426601.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
<span style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 16px; MARGIN-LEFT:
4px"><script> digg_url = 'http://digg.com/gadgets/MOTO_touchscreen_comparison_recruits_robotic_implements_for'; </script><script
src="http://digg.com/api/diggthis.js"></script></span>So you saw that the first <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/09/moto-gives-straight-advice-on-smartphone-touchscreen-quality/">MOTO smartphone touchscreen comparison</a> was done with a fleshy humanoid controlling the testing finger and discounted it as scientifically flawed? Well, MOTO's back and this time the arm of judgment is operated by a coldly mechanical and ruthlessly precise robot -- a machine in itself, we'll assume the robot is intrinsically immune to developing fanboy tendencies. Joining the iPhone, Droid Eris, Droid, and Nexus One of the earlier test are Palm's Pre and RIM's BlackBerry Storm 2, whose results you can see at the source link below. The full test methodology is also explained there, including a list of the drawing apps used, which were selected with a view to minimizing smoothing algorithms that may prejudice the outcome. We're not gonna tell you who won, you have eyes of your own after all, and will just direct you after the break for the full robot-on-smartphone video action.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/24/moto-touchscreen-comparison-recruits-robotic-implements-for-heig/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>MOTO touchscreen comparison recruits robotic implements for heightened precision (video)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/24/moto-touchscreen-comparison-recruits-robotic-implements-for-heig/">MOTO touchscreen comparison recruits robotic implements for heightened precision (video)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Wed, 24 Mar 2010 07:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/24/moto-touchscreen-comparison-recruits-robotic-implements-for-heig/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;|&nbsp; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif" alt="source"/><span class="caption"><a href="http://labs.moto.com/robot_touchscreen_analysis/">MOTO</a><!--//--></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19412173/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/24/moto-touchscreen-comparison-recruits-robotic-implements-for-heig/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.certpiles.com/moto-touchscreen-comparison-recruits-robotic-implements-for-heightened-precision-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opera Mini for iPhone submitted to Apple for approval (video)</title>
		<link>http://www.certpiles.com/opera-mini-for-iphone-submitted-to-apple-for-approval-video/</link>
		<comments>http://www.certpiles.com/opera-mini-for-iphone-submitted-to-apple-for-approval-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Ricker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app store approval]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app store approval process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AppStore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AppStoreApproval]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AppStoreApprovalProcess]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breaking news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BreakingNews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod touch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IpodTouch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MobileBrowser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opera mini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OperaMini]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/opera-submits-opera-mini-for-iphone-to-apple-for-approval-video/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/opera-submits-opera-mini-for-iphone-to-apple-for-approval-video/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/02/mini-iphone-1.png" style="width: 168px;height: 291px" alt="" /></a> <span style="float: left;margin-right: 10px;margin-top: 7px">  var digg_url = 'http://digg.com/gadgets/Opera_Mini_for_iPhone_submitted_you_must_see_the_video';  </span>Can you feel the tension? Opera is now in the throes of the App Store approval process. The wait is on to see if Apple will loosen its grip and approve the fast (<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/17/opera-mini-on-iphone-is-fast-but-why/">very fast</a>) Opera Mini browser for iPhone app that we checked out at MWC. Remember, Opera Mini relies on Opera's servers to render and compress pages before sending them back to the iPhone for display. As such, there's no code interpretation being done by the software -- a definite no no for approval. So the only thing that could cause Apple to reject the app would be a perceived duplication of core iPhone functionality even though it already <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/14/apple-suddenly-approves-a-bunch-of-browsers-for-app-store-major/">approved several WebKit-based</a> browsers. Whatever happens, this is going to be good.<br />
<br />
<strong>Update</strong>: Opera just threw up a counter <a href="http://my.opera.com/community/countup/">tracking how long the approval</a> process has taken. You know, 'cause everyone likes to be backed into a corner. Makes you wonder if Opera is serious about this or just doing it for the publicity -- <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/17/opera-mini-on-iphone-is-fast-but-why/">one of several angles</a> we mulled earlier. <br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/opera-mini-for-iphone-submitted-to-apple-for-approval-video/">Opera Mini for iPhone submitted to Apple for approval (video)</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/opera-mini-for-iphone-submitted-to-apple-for-approval-video/2823969/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/01-speed-dial-1269346872_thumbnail.png" alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/opera-mini-for-iphone-submitted-to-apple-for-approval-video/2823970/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/02-tabs-nyt-1269346876_thumbnail.png" alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/opera-mini-for-iphone-submitted-to-apple-for-approval-video/2823971/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/03-context-menu-nyt-1269346880_thumbnail.png" alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/opera-mini-for-iphone-submitted-to-apple-for-approval-video/2823972/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/04-tools-nyt-1269346884_thumbnail.png" alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/opera-mini-for-iphone-submitted-to-apple-for-approval-video/2823973/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/05-settings-1269346887_thumbnail.png" alt="" /></a></div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/opera-submits-opera-mini-for-iphone-to-apple-for-approval-video/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Opera Mini for iPhone submitted to Apple for approval (video)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/opera-submits-opera-mini-for-iphone-to-apple-for-approval-video/">Opera Mini for iPhone submitted to Apple for approval (video)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both;padding: 8px 0 0 0;height: 2px;font-size: 1px;border: 0;margin: 0;padding: 0"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/opera-submits-opera-mini-for-iphone-to-apple-for-approval-video/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160; &#160;&#124;&#160;  &#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19410601/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/opera-submits-opera-mini-for-iphone-to-apple-for-approval-video/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/opera-submits-opera-mini-for-iphone-to-apple-for-approval-video/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/02/mini-iphone-1.png" style="width: 168px; height: 291px;" alt="" /></a> <span style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-top: 7px;"> <script> var digg_url = 'http://digg.com/gadgets/Opera_Mini_for_iPhone_submitted_you_must_see_the_video'; </script> <script src="http://digg.com/api/diggthis.js"></script></span>Can you feel the tension? Opera is now in the throes of the App Store approval process. The wait is on to see if Apple will loosen its grip and approve the fast (<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/17/opera-mini-on-iphone-is-fast-but-why/">very fast</a>) Opera Mini browser for iPhone app that we checked out at MWC. Remember, Opera Mini relies on Opera's servers to render and compress pages before sending them back to the iPhone for display. As such, there's no code interpretation being done by the software -- a definite no no for approval. So the only thing that could cause Apple to reject the app would be a perceived duplication of core iPhone functionality even though it already <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/14/apple-suddenly-approves-a-bunch-of-browsers-for-app-store-major/">approved several WebKit-based</a> browsers. Whatever happens, this is going to be good.<br />
<br />
<strong>Update</strong>: Opera just threw up a counter <a href="http://my.opera.com/community/countup/">tracking how long the approval</a> process has taken. You know, 'cause everyone likes to be backed into a corner. Makes you wonder if Opera is serious about this or just doing it for the publicity -- <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/17/opera-mini-on-iphone-is-fast-but-why/">one of several angles</a> we mulled earlier. <br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/opera-mini-for-iphone-submitted-to-apple-for-approval-video/">Opera Mini for iPhone submitted to Apple for approval (video)</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/opera-mini-for-iphone-submitted-to-apple-for-approval-video/2823969/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/01-speed-dial-1269346872_thumbnail.png" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/opera-mini-for-iphone-submitted-to-apple-for-approval-video/2823970/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/02-tabs-nyt-1269346876_thumbnail.png" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/opera-mini-for-iphone-submitted-to-apple-for-approval-video/2823971/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/03-context-menu-nyt-1269346880_thumbnail.png" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/opera-mini-for-iphone-submitted-to-apple-for-approval-video/2823972/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/04-tools-nyt-1269346884_thumbnail.png" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/opera-mini-for-iphone-submitted-to-apple-for-approval-video/2823973/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/05-settings-1269346887_thumbnail.png" alt="" title="" /></a></div><p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/opera-submits-opera-mini-for-iphone-to-apple-for-approval-video/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Opera Mini for iPhone submitted to Apple for approval (video)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/opera-submits-opera-mini-for-iphone-to-apple-for-approval-video/">Opera Mini for iPhone submitted to Apple for approval (video)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/opera-submits-opera-mini-for-iphone-to-apple-for-approval-video/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;|&nbsp;  &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19410601/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/opera-submits-opera-mini-for-iphone-to-apple-for-approval-video/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.certpiles.com/opera-mini-for-iphone-submitted-to-apple-for-approval-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Most iPad Apps to be only Games on Launch</title>
		<link>http://www.certpiles.com/most-ipad-apps-to-be-only-games-on-launch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.certpiles.com/most-ipad-apps-to-be-only-games-on-launch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad Apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad apps games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad apps launch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sizlopedia.com/?p=8559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to the recent stats released by Flurry, a web analytics firm, it seems as if Apple thinks of iPad more as a gaming device more than anything else. The statistics released by the firm bring to light the time the Cupertinos are spending on testing the various categories of Apps for the upcoming Apple [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the recent stats released by Flurry, a web analytics firm, it seems as if Apple thinks of iPad more as a gaming device more than anything else. The statistics released by the firm bring to light the time the Cupertinos are spending on testing the various categories of Apps for the upcoming Apple Tablet. As one would expect, Apple is spending nearly half percent of the time, 44% to be exact for testing various games.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img src="http://www.sizlopedia.com/wp-content/uploads/Apple-iPad-Games-Launch-e1264630904445.png" alt="" title="Apple-iPad-Games-Launch-e1264630904445" width="477" height="409" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-8578" /></p>
<p>There is more than one way to look at these interesting stats. One explanation would be that the gaming apps are larger in quantity and naturally would require more time for testing. Another possibility is that the games normally require more testing (various gestures etc) than other categories of apps.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img src="http://www.sizlopedia.com/wp-content/uploads/flurryappcategorytestingtime.jpeg" alt="" title="flurryappcategorytestingtime" width="500" height="368" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-8580" /></p>
<p>It should be no surprise even if the games turn out to be the attracting as well as the selling point of the iPad. Imagine the gaming experience on a larger screen than the ones iPhone or iPod Touch possess.</p>
<p>The remaining top two spots for most  testing time spent go to the Entertainment category and Social Networking. No surprises there.</p>
<p>[via <a href="http://mashable.com/2010/03/22/half-ipad-apps-tested-games/">Mashable</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.certpiles.com/most-ipad-apps-to-be-only-games-on-launch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple increases gaming share at the expense of DS and PSP</title>
		<link>http://www.certpiles.com/apple-increases-gaming-share-at-the-expense-of-ds-and-psp/</link>
		<comments>http://www.certpiles.com/apple-increases-gaming-share-at-the-expense-of-ds-and-psp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Ricker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flurry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flurry Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FlurryAnalytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[handheld gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HandheldGaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nintendo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RevenueShare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SoftwareRevenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/apple-increases-gaming-share-at-the-expense-of-ds-and-psp/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/apple-increases-gaming-share-at-the-expense-of-ds-and-psp/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/iphoneusportablegameshare2009.png" alt="" /></a></div>
Apple's intentions to dominate handheld gaming were already pretty clear back in <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/10/iphone-guns-for-psp-and-ds-market-share-as-gameloft-commits/">March of 2008</a> as game studio after game studio lined up behind the iPhone (and iPod touch by extension). Now look at the graphics above. Yeah, based on the report from Flurry Analytics, Apple's casual gaming approach is carving out a nice slice of the US revenue pie related to gaming software. The PSP was hit especially hard dropping from a 20% share in 2008 to just 11% of US revenue last year. Numbers that highlight just how ridiculous <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/sonys-john-koller-apples-entrance-into-gaming-market-drives-c/">John Koller's spin maneuver</a> was after the iPad launch. Speaking of which, you have to wonder how these numbers might be affected once developers have a chance to spread out on the iPad, looming <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/nintendo-announces-3ds-the-glasses-free-3d-successor-to-the-d/">Nintendo 3DS</a> or not. Especially with early data showing <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/ipad-pre-orders-estimated-at-over-150-000-possibly-ahead-of-i/">robust pre-sales</a> and games accounting for almost half of the iPad apps being tested. See that chart after the break. Mmm, pie.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/apple-increases-gaming-share-at-the-expense-of-ds-and-psp/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Apple increases gaming share at the expense of DS and PSP</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/apple-increases-gaming-share-at-the-expense-of-ds-and-psp/">Apple increases gaming share at the expense of DS and PSP</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 23 Mar 2010 06:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both;padding: 8px 0 0 0;height: 2px;font-size: 1px;border: 0;margin: 0;padding: 0"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/apple-increases-gaming-share-at-the-expense-of-ds-and-psp/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160; &#160;&#124;&#160; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif"><span class="caption"><a href="http://blog.flurry.com/bid/31566/Apple-iPhone-and-iPod-touch-Capture-U-S-Video-Game-Market-Share">Flurry</a><!--//-->, <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/10/03/22/games_command_44_of_apps_tested_by_apple_for_use_with_ipad.html">Appleinsider</a><!--//--></span> &#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19410523/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/apple-increases-gaming-share-at-the-expense-of-ds-and-psp/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/apple-increases-gaming-share-at-the-expense-of-ds-and-psp/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/iphoneusportablegameshare2009.png" alt="" /></a></div>
Apple's intentions to dominate handheld gaming were already pretty clear back in <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/10/iphone-guns-for-psp-and-ds-market-share-as-gameloft-commits/">March of 2008</a> as game studio after game studio lined up behind the iPhone (and iPod touch by extension). Now look at the graphics above. Yeah, based on the report from Flurry Analytics, Apple's casual gaming approach is carving out a nice slice of the US revenue pie related to gaming software. The PSP was hit especially hard dropping from a 20% share in 2008 to just 11% of US revenue last year. Numbers that highlight just how ridiculous <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/31/sonys-john-koller-apples-entrance-into-gaming-market-drives-c/">John Koller's spin maneuver</a> was after the iPad launch. Speaking of which, you have to wonder how these numbers might be affected once developers have a chance to spread out on the iPad, looming <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/nintendo-announces-3ds-the-glasses-free-3d-successor-to-the-d/">Nintendo 3DS</a> or not. Especially with early data showing <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/15/ipad-pre-orders-estimated-at-over-150-000-possibly-ahead-of-i/">robust pre-sales</a> and games accounting for almost half of the iPad apps being tested. See that chart after the break. Mmm, pie.<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/apple-increases-gaming-share-at-the-expense-of-ds-and-psp/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Apple increases gaming share at the expense of DS and PSP</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/apple-increases-gaming-share-at-the-expense-of-ds-and-psp/">Apple increases gaming share at the expense of DS and PSP</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Tue, 23 Mar 2010 06:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/apple-increases-gaming-share-at-the-expense-of-ds-and-psp/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;|&nbsp; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif" alt="source"/><span class="caption"><a href="http://blog.flurry.com/bid/31566/Apple-iPhone-and-iPod-touch-Capture-U-S-Video-Game-Market-Share">Flurry</a><!--//-->, <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/10/03/22/games_command_44_of_apps_tested_by_apple_for_use_with_ipad.html">Appleinsider</a><!--//--></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19410523/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/apple-increases-gaming-share-at-the-expense-of-ds-and-psp/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.certpiles.com/apple-increases-gaming-share-at-the-expense-of-ds-and-psp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Official: Apple now offering iPhones contract free (updated: not unlocked)</title>
		<link>http://www.certpiles.com/official-apple-now-offering-iphones-contract-free-updated-not-unlocked/</link>
		<comments>http://www.certpiles.com/official-apple-now-offering-iphones-contract-free-updated-not-unlocked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Topolsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AppleEmployees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AppleStore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breaking news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BreakingNews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone 3g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone 3GS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone unlocked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iphone3g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iphone3gs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IphoneUnlocked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NoContract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speculation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unlock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unlocked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unlocked iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unlocked iphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UnlockedIphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UnlockedIphones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/22/official-apple-now-offering-iphones-unlocked/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center"><a href="http://www.9to5mac.com/apple-store-unlocked-iphones-4325092347"><img border="0" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/07/iphone-3gs-hands-on.jpg" /></a></div>
We heard from <em>9 to 5 Mac</em> that Apple was due to begin selling a contract-free variant of the iPhone in the near future "at list price." And guess what happened when we inquired to an Apple store? That's right folks -- you can now pick one up for $499 (3G), $599, or $699 (3GS). We've confirmed this info at no less than five stores, so you should be hearing the same message at your local Appletorium. Given the current <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/apple-vs-google-gets-personal-steve-jobs-simply-hates-eric-sc/">unfriendly climate</a> between Apple and Google, this could be seen as nasty jab, though the devices are still carrier-locked to AT&#38;T, so you're not being given much freedom... and it's certainly not much of a statement. In many parts of Europe (France and Poland, for example) you can pick up the carrier-unattached device (and we mean totally unlocked), but that doesn't appear to be the case here.<br />
<strong><br />
Update: </strong>We're getting mixed reports on the unlock status of these phones. One store says yes to the unlock, while others are saying they're still AT&#38;T-locked devices being sold off contract. We're digging for more info on this now, so stay tuned.<br />
<br />
<strong>Update 2:</strong> It's looking like those initial reports of unlocked devices are inaccurate. It sounds like these devices are still locked to AT&#38;T -- so you're just looking at an off contract pricing scheme. Which is also totally lame.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/22/official-apple-now-offering-iphones-unlocked/">Official: Apple now offering iPhones contract free (updated: not unlocked)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:08:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both;padding: 8px 0 0 0;height: 2px;font-size: 1px;border: 0;margin: 0;padding: 0"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/22/official-apple-now-offering-iphones-unlocked/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160; &#160;&#124;&#160; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif"><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.9to5mac.com/apple-store-unlocked-iphones-4325092347">9 to 5 Mac</a></span> &#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19409988/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/22/official-apple-now-offering-iphones-unlocked/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.9to5mac.com/apple-store-unlocked-iphones-4325092347"><img border="0" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/07/iphone-3gs-hands-on.jpg" /></a></div>
We heard from <em>9 to 5 Mac</em> that Apple was due to begin selling a contract-free variant of the iPhone in the near future "at list price." And guess what happened when we inquired to an Apple store? That's right folks -- you can now pick one up for $499 (3G), $599, or $699 (3GS). We've confirmed this info at no less than five stores, so you should be hearing the same message at your local Appletorium. Given the current <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/apple-vs-google-gets-personal-steve-jobs-simply-hates-eric-sc/">unfriendly climate</a> between Apple and Google, this could be seen as nasty jab, though the devices are still carrier-locked to AT&amp;T, so you're not being given much freedom... and it's certainly not much of a statement. In many parts of Europe (France and Poland, for example) you can pick up the carrier-unattached device (and we mean totally unlocked), but that doesn't appear to be the case here.<br />
<strong><br />
Update: </strong>We're getting mixed reports on the unlock status of these phones. One store says yes to the unlock, while others are saying they're still AT&amp;T-locked devices being sold off contract. We're digging for more info on this now, so stay tuned.<br />
<br />
<strong>Update 2:</strong> It's looking like those initial reports of unlocked devices are inaccurate. It sounds like these devices are still locked to AT&amp;T -- so you're just looking at an off contract pricing scheme. Which is also totally lame.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/22/official-apple-now-offering-iphones-unlocked/">Official: Apple now offering iPhones contract free (updated: not unlocked)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:08:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/22/official-apple-now-offering-iphones-unlocked/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;|&nbsp; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif" alt="source"/><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.9to5mac.com/apple-store-unlocked-iphones-4325092347">9 to 5 Mac</a></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19409988/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/22/official-apple-now-offering-iphones-unlocked/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.certpiles.com/official-apple-now-offering-iphones-contract-free-updated-not-unlocked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kindle for iPad and tablets makes the scene</title>
		<link>http://www.certpiles.com/kindle-for-ipad-and-tablets-makes-the-scene/</link>
		<comments>http://www.certpiles.com/kindle-for-ipad-and-tablets-makes-the-scene/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 07:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Ricker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amaon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breaking news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BreakingNews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-book reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-bookReader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EBook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebook reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EBookReader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ereader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kindle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kindle store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KindleStore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skiff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skiff reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SkiffReader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/22/kindle-for-ipad-and-tablets-makes-the-scene/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/navarro-sect01-popover.v215370788silhouette.jpg" /></div>
It must be getting close to April 3rd because the iPad news is hotting up. Today we get our first glimpse at Amazon's free Kindle app for the iPad. We've also got a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/barnes-and-noble-promises-bandn-ereader-app-for-ipad-near-launch/">Barnes &#38; Noble iPad app</a> on the way, courtesy of a report in the <em>New York Times</em>, that has been completely redesigned by a team of 14 developers working since January to allow for custom fonts in multiple colors and quick page turns with finger swipes. The Kindle app, meanwhile, features a redefined core screen and reading experience, slow page turns, and new ways to view your eBook library. One view, pictured above, presents your books as large icons against a silhouetted figure under a tree -- the sun changes position in accordance to the time of day. Of course, the app also gives you access to the Kindle bookstore (assuming Apple approves) and saves your reading position so that you can pick up any Kindle app (or device) and continue reading right where you left off. <br />
<br />
Fortunately, Amazon's Kindle App will be targeting tablets beyond the iPad. We're also hearing that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/skiff">Skiff</a> is almost certainly headed to Apple's tablet, and we suspect as many competitors as possible given the plethora of devices <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/skiff-e-reader-hands-on-kindle-watch-out/">demonstrated to us at CES</a>. So seriously, we ask you, in an age where content is king, are you really going to buy an eReader dedicated to a single store?<br />
<br />
<strong>Update</strong>: The Barnes &#38; Noble app, <em>not</em> the Kindle app, is being worked on by a team of 14 developers.<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/kindle-for-ipad-and-tablets-makes-the-scene/">Kindle for iPad and tablets makes the scene</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/kindle-for-ipad-and-tablets-makes-the-scene/2819763/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/navarro-sect02-popover.v215370791_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/kindle-for-ipad-and-tablets-makes-the-scene/2819764/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/navarro-sect03-popover.v215426232_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a></div><br />
[Thanks, Jason D.]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/22/kindle-for-ipad-and-tablets-makes-the-scene/">Kindle for iPad and tablets makes the scene</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:38:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both;padding: 8px 0 0 0;height: 2px;font-size: 1px;border: 0;margin: 0;padding: 0"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/22/kindle-for-ipad-and-tablets-makes-the-scene/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&#160;<img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_VIA.gif"><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/22/technology/22apps.html?pagewanted=1">New York Times</a><!--//--></span> &#160;&#124;&#160; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif"><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/feature.html?docId=1000490441">Amazon</a><!--//-->, <a href="http://twitter.com/harrymccracken/status/10585621873">Twitter (Skiff)</a><!--//--></span> &#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19408616/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&#160;&#124;&#160;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/22/kindle-for-ipad-and-tablets-makes-the-scene/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/navarro-sect01-popover.v215370788silhouette.jpg" /></div>
It must be getting close to April 3rd because the iPad news is hotting up. Today we get our first glimpse at Amazon's free Kindle app for the iPad. We've also got a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/11/barnes-and-noble-promises-bandn-ereader-app-for-ipad-near-launch/">Barnes &amp; Noble iPad app</a> on the way, courtesy of a report in the <em>New York Times</em>, that has been completely redesigned by a team of 14 developers working since January to allow for custom fonts in multiple colors and quick page turns with finger swipes. The Kindle app, meanwhile, features a redefined core screen and reading experience, slow page turns, and new ways to view your eBook library. One view, pictured above, presents your books as large icons against a silhouetted figure under a tree -- the sun changes position in accordance to the time of day. Of course, the app also gives you access to the Kindle bookstore (assuming Apple approves) and saves your reading position so that you can pick up any Kindle app (or device) and continue reading right where you left off. <br />
<br />
Fortunately, Amazon's Kindle App will be targeting tablets beyond the iPad. We're also hearing that <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/skiff">Skiff</a> is almost certainly headed to Apple's tablet, and we suspect as many competitors as possible given the plethora of devices <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/07/skiff-e-reader-hands-on-kindle-watch-out/">demonstrated to us at CES</a>. So seriously, we ask you, in an age where content is king, are you really going to buy an eReader dedicated to a single store?<br />
<br />
<strong>Update</strong>: The Barnes &amp; Noble app, <em>not</em> the Kindle app, is being worked on by a team of 14 developers.<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/kindle-for-ipad-and-tablets-makes-the-scene/">Kindle for iPad and tablets makes the scene</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/kindle-for-ipad-and-tablets-makes-the-scene/2819763/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/navarro-sect02-popover.v215370791_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/kindle-for-ipad-and-tablets-makes-the-scene/2819764/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/navarro-sect03-popover.v215426232_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />
[Thanks, Jason D.]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/22/kindle-for-ipad-and-tablets-makes-the-scene/">Kindle for iPad and tablets makes the scene</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:38:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/22/kindle-for-ipad-and-tablets-makes-the-scene/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;<img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_VIA.gif" alt=""/><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/22/technology/22apps.html?pagewanted=1">New York Times</a><!--//--></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif" alt="source"/><span class="caption"><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/feature.html?docId=1000490441">Amazon</a><!--//-->, <a href="http://twitter.com/harrymccracken/status/10585621873">Twitter (Skiff)</a><!--//--></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19408616/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/22/kindle-for-ipad-and-tablets-makes-the-scene/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.certpiles.com/kindle-for-ipad-and-tablets-makes-the-scene/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

